Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters?
Robert E. Seastrom
rs at seastrom.com
Fri Aug 15 08:34:48 CDT 2008
Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> writes:
>> In other words, our earlier estimate of 60% was way off... you can
>> get 92.1% effectiveness at bogon filtering by just dropping 1918
>> addresses, a filter that you will never have to change.
> my read is that the 60% was an alleged 60% of attacks came from *all*
> bogon space. this now seems in the low single digit percentge. of
> that, the majority is from 1918 space.
so is there any case to be made for filtering bogons on
upstream/peering ingress at all anymore?
(this discussion is orthogonal to bcp38/urpf, which i think we all
agree is a good thing and would be great if we could get it further
More information about the NANOG