Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mis take
fergdawg at netzero.net
Fri Aug 15 00:37:56 CDT 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- -- Danny McPherson <danny at tcb.net> wrote:
>OK, so we were talking past one another. I agree with everything
>you said above, and simply meant to highlight the fact that RPKI
>validation will change things (quite necessarily, IMO), and folks
>need to be paying attention to this.
Okay, I admit I haven't paid the closest attention to RPKI, but I
have to ask: Is this a two-way shared-key issue, or (worse) a case
where we need to rely on a central entity to be a key clearinghouse?
The reason why I mention this is obvious -- the entire PKI effort
has been stalled (w.r.t. authority) because of this particular
Any thoughts on that?
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
More information about the NANOG