Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Wed Aug 13 15:52:46 CDT 2008
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:04:27PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> The italian courts seem to have told ISPs there to block ThePirateBay
>> (bittorrent tracker), and this evening (CET) LLNW (AS22822)
>> 22.214.171.124/24 via 6762 (telecom italia) to what I presume is most of
>> Basically same thing that happened when people tried to block
>> YouTube a
>> few months back (afghanistan?).
>> How do we hinder this in the short term? I know there are a lot of
>> term solutions that very few is implementing, but would the fact that
>> these mistakes are brought up into the (lime)light by a public
>> list make ISPs shape up and perform less mistakes?
>> I am still waiting for a response from LLNW NOC on the issue.
> Sure. I'd also like to see providers actually just shut
> off customers that originate stuff like ms-sql slammer
> packets still. But it keeps flowing. I'm sure there are
> smurf amps and other badness still going. codered anyone?
> these are all issues, but operational? depends.
I beg to differ, this is absolutely operational.
> If LLNW is not being filtered by telecom italia, time for
> 6762 to fix that. If they persist, will you depeer them
> as a security risk until they clean up their act?
De-peering won't help if someone is propagating it as a transit
customer route. Filtering the prefix is all you can do.
P.S. Obligatory BCP38 shout-out, even though it's not exactly on-
> I'm still amazed at the AS_PATHs that appear
> out there and the providers that can't figure out how to
> Why AS174 would listen to 3549 routes from AS12713
> is beyond me, but it's there.
> 126.96.36.199/24 1280 174 12713 3549 2914 9498 9583
> - jared
> 1 - http://puck.nether.net/bgp/leakinfo.cgi
> - http://puck.nether.net/bgp/stats.cgi?days=3
> Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
> clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are
> only mine.
More information about the NANOG