hannigan at gmail.com
Sat Aug 9 00:49:47 CDT 2008
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:56 PM, brett watson <brett at the-watsons.org> wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
>> Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
>>> Turning nanog into a rehash of digg's technology section or the front
>>> page of news.com reduces nanog's utility.
>> As does the days and days of rehash of one of Gadi's postings.
> And all of this BS is even *more* off topic than folks are claiming Gadi's
> post was. This list goes off topic all the time, at least Gadi's post was
Not only was his post technical, it was relevant to operator revenue.
"Application" doesn't take these calls, the network operators do. I
can't think of a more relevant NANOG post of late. Saving us a
headache by predefining an issue seems quite on topic to me. FWIW.
[ No offense towards "Application" intended.]
More information about the NANOG