Postmaster @ vtext.com (or what are best practice to send SMS these days)
deepak at ai.net
Wed Apr 16 23:37:17 UTC 2008
Verizon at least, uses SS7 signaling to deliver on-network SMS. This
means they can provide delivery confirmation with their SMSes. I am not
aware of another US network that does this or interacts with Verizon
over SS7 for SMS exchange.
So, if you are using a phone's SMS capability on the same network (e.g.
Verizon) and it has delivery confirmation you might be very happy.
David Coulson wrote:
> In my experience, even with TAP, sending messages to a cell phone is
> spotty at best. I have folks on both uni-directional pagers via TAP or
> SNPP, as well as cell phones via e-mail and TAP. There isn't a
> noticeable difference in delivery time between e-mail and TAP on the
> Cell to Cell is probably the best option if you want to stick with SMS
> to cell phones. I have no idea how reliable it is between carriers. I
> still get some comfort knowing that people have pagers with a TAP
> gateway - I've no idea how the technology differs between a pager and
> SMS, but it seems much more reliable. All of the pager problems I've had
> in the last few years have been, erm, 'payment related'.
> David Ulevitch wrote:
>> We've noticed that 1234567890 at vtext.com is no longer a very reliable
>> form of delivery for alerts from Nagios, et al. It seems as our
>> volume of alerts has risen, our delivery rate has dropped precipitously.
>> We don't expect much trying to actually reach a postmaster for
>> vtext.com so I thought the better question would be to ask what the
>> current best practice is to get SMS alerts out?
>> Back in the day, I remember a company I worked for had something
>> called a TAP gateway. Is that still a good route? I've also been
>> told to check out an SMS gateway/api service called clickatell.com --
>> anyone using them to delivering timely notifications?
>> Is the best thing to do to try and get a programmable cellphone in a
>> What else are operators doing to get the pages out when things go wonky?
More information about the NANOG