Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update]

Tue Apr 15 15:41:13 UTC 2008

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Joe Provo <nanog-post at rsuc.gweep.net> wrote:

>It cannot be understated that even packet pushers and code grinders
who care get stranded in companies where abuse handling is deemed 
by management to be a cost center that only saps resources.  Paul, 
you are doing a serious disservice to those folks in specific, and
working around such suit-induced damage in general, by dismissing 
any steps involving automation.
>

Well, I did not intend to do disservice to anyone's efforts, but
the point I am trying to make is that there still is no good way
for people to report malicious activity to the legitimate owners
of the content or the netblock.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)

wj8DBQFIBMyPq1pz9mNUZTMRAoiwAKDrdTSosQIT0r1BeRh2tvIQ5+at1QCgmS5W
gdgRZ+CokBXlcfCehWtJKQg=
=QDXi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/