Contact at

Lou Katz lou at
Wed Apr 2 17:47:07 UTC 2008

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 12:13:29PM -0400, Christina Klam wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Does someone have a contact name at  When one of our users
> tried to send an email to a host at, we discovered that
> we are being blocked by  From my gmail account, I have sent
> multiple emails to the contacts listed in APNIC. But, no one has
> responded.  Moreover, when I sent an email to postmaster at, the
> email bounced as that mailbox does not exist.
> If someone has an IP range of 192.X.X.X, can you see if you see if you
> can get to  At this point I do not know if someone fat
> fingered a RFC1918 ACL & is blocking instead of
>, or if they are blocking us upon our AS number (26099).

I suspect fat fingers. I am 192.160.193.X and get the following:

lou at pop:/users/lou -=[1]=- telnet smtp


lou at pop:/users/lou -=[2]=- dig

; <<>> DiG 9.2.1rc2 <<>>
;; global options:  printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached

lou at pop:/users/lou -=[3]=- whois
Domain Name:
ROID: 20021209s10061s00002107-cn
Domain Status: serverDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: serverUpdateProhibited
Domain Status: serverTransferProhibited
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Name: 信息化办主任
Administrative Email: master at
Sponsoring Registrar: 网络中心
Registration Date: 2002-10-17 00:00
Expiration Date: 2010-10-17 00:00
lou at pop:/users/lou -=[4]=- dig mx

; <<>> DiG 9.2.1rc2 <<>> mx
;; global options:  printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
lou at pop:/users/lou -=[5]=- 

However, from an account I have elsewhere,

well% telnet smtp
Connected to
Escape character is '^]'.
220 ESMTP Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.8.2-GA Queueing
221 Goodbye
Connection closed by foreign host.

> Thanks,
> - -- Cmk
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
> iQEVAwUBR/Owqd9pUgshfvqBAQLeOAf/bbgGcH9kVAaWRQQ8kymXBLIme4W3u0Gl
> /6AHmdwK/CAxEwd+PYSl0ZsoHtdfwdHSRzRUGFyP1BLEObJjm2Vck8QEVTJMUgyl
> oo+qqJ3FMN6TpYaaMo+l+O72FQtQJrIGdnpHT32ulCuHcqRb+9iepqOK6jru7SAp
> xHlGHqUjgULHM8jU6K9l3RZF7zmvZOuuhcs+gKcqayFg8CaEIhssnC3NV4IiSg9y
> doWnOfVQ0xow6SPbwkfcfFSA6iVWO3Ot2mdgswtT9FLeCQZdECqCCJn8pEPluOLR
> 8cti46MAZIWLRyCTR5yziWpyjzcwgOfwQeCnOew4RXI/Jw/z6nMuxQ==
> =B25R


C++ produces no noticeable overhead versus C.

More information about the NANOG mailing list