i think the cogent depeering thing is a myth of some kind
repstein at chello.at
Fri Sep 28 23:24:34 UTC 2007
> at <http://www.e-gerbil.net/cogent-t1r> there is a plain text document
> the following HTTP headers:
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:56:34 GMT
> Server: Apache/2.2.3 (Unix) PHP/5.2.3
> Last-Modified: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:15:53 GMT
> ETag: "92c1e1-a85-43b36ea5bcc40"
> Content-Length: 2693
> Content-Type: text/plain
> the plain text title is:
> Cogent shows hypocrisy with de-peering policy
> the plain text authorship is ascribed to:
> Dan Golding
Clearly you can see the article was published by T1R in their Daily T1R
(listed under "The Daily T1R Headlines")
If you subscribe to the Daily T1R, you can find Dan's report issued today.
> since i appear to be reaching the aforementioned web server by a path that
> includes cogent-to-nlayer, i think this part of the plain text is
I think Dan overstepped here. Richard has made comments of a de-peering
notice received by nLayer, not an actual de-peering occurrence.
AFAIK, the only two networks in recent weeks that have been de-peered are WV
Fiber and LimeLight. WV was de-peered a couple on September 17th and
LimeLight was de-peered yesterday.
More information about the NANOG