Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
alain_durand at cable.comcast.com
Fri Sep 28 21:38:42 UTC 2007
On 10/21/07 5:13 PM, "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch at muada.com> wrote:
> I think an approach where you have a regular IPv4 NAT and then tunnel
> the RFC 1918 addresses over an IPv6-only network would work better
> than NAT-PT.
The issue here is that the translation would have to occur at the box that
is decapsulating the packet, as the mapping private-v4 to v4 would have to
be indexed by some kind of tunnel ID that identifies the customer.
If you translate v4 to v6 at the home gateway, you have a global v6 address
to identify that customer and you can do the reverse translation (back to
v4) pretty much anywhere you want in the service provider network.
More information about the NANOG