WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)

Randy Bush randy at psg.com
Fri Sep 28 04:34:36 UTC 2007


> I know this very well. But I'm listening. We are already trying to do
> something about nat-pt. What else would you see as a priority?

give v6 a break and stop complicating it further while we figure out how
the heck to deploy it.

though maybe the old benchmark/testing stuff could be revived to do
forwarding and control plane performance testing so we can get some
honesty into the vendor game.

randy



More information about the NANOG mailing list