WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
randy at psg.com
Fri Sep 28 04:34:36 UTC 2007
> I know this very well. But I'm listening. We are already trying to do
> something about nat-pt. What else would you see as a priority?
give v6 a break and stop complicating it further while we figure out how
the heck to deploy it.
though maybe the old benchmark/testing stuff could be revived to do
forwarding and control plane performance testing so we can get some
honesty into the vendor game.
More information about the NANOG