WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)

Randy Bush randy at psg.com
Fri Sep 28 04:34:36 UTC 2007

> I know this very well. But I'm listening. We are already trying to do
> something about nat-pt. What else would you see as a priority?

give v6 a break and stop complicating it further while we figure out how
the heck to deploy it.

though maybe the old benchmark/testing stuff could be revived to do
forwarding and control plane performance testing so we can get some
honesty into the vendor game.


More information about the NANOG mailing list