WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)

Fri Sep 28 04:26:46 UTC 2007

Randy,

> with all due respect, jari; maybe the number of groups is neither the
> problem nor the solution
>
> too much energy has been and is still being wasted dealing with overly
> cute/complex ideas these wgs invent to fancy up ipv6 so it will be
> deployed; from tla/nla/... to ula to sham6.  this has prevented focusing
> on the real problems of deployment so they can be solved.
>   

I know this very well. But I'm listening. We are already trying
to do something about nat-pt. What else would you see as
a priority?

Jari