Question on Loosely Synchronized Router Clocks

• Previous message (by thread): Question on Loosely Synchronized Router Clocks
• Next message (by thread): Question on Loosely Synchronized Router Clocks
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>> ... is it reasonable to assume clock synchronization in the rest
>> of our design?

> In general, it is not.  I can't think of any existing protocol that
> does, actually.

Kerberos.
-- 
Jeff McAdams
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                                       -- Benjamin Franklin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070919/6f4b72ff/attachment.sig>

• Previous message (by thread): Question on Loosely Synchronized Router Clocks
• Next message (by thread): Question on Loosely Synchronized Router Clocks
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]