Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
adrian at creative.net.au
Wed Sep 12 01:53:15 UTC 2007
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Jon Lewis wrote:
> You could even do two different versions. A loose version that just
> throws out covered subnets with same as-path and a BOFH version that
> throws out all apparently gratuitous subnetting smaller than RIR
> minimums, but not all smaller than RIR minimum routes.
> I just wonder how huge the list would be and what the CPU and config size
> damage would be.
If only people were charged for CPU time and RIB hardware space
used on other peoples' routers to carry their stuff.
(<tongue, cheek, etc />)
More information about the NANOG