Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
Russ White
riw at cisco.com
Sat Sep 8 22:13:30 UTC 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Maybe this is a dumb question, but why isn't there a BGP option to just
> filter more specific routes that have the same AS path as the larger
> aggregate? This would allow the networks that announce more specifics for
> traffic engineering to still accomplish that, while throwing away the
> garbage from someone else that decides to announce their /19 as 33 routes
> for no apparent reason. Sure, this would fail if a network decided to
> only announce /24's for example without a larger aggregate, but how many
> networks are really doing that?
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/03nov/I-D/draft-grow-bounded-longest-match-00.txt
As a matter of fact.
:-)
Russ
- --
riw at cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG4x6KER27sUhU9OQRAs/ZAJ9LARtnoo7YUshwBCuGyj/fVO7MJACg/2AI
Qe6P+ImcLKnan97HlwmYVjQ=
=zgmF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG
mailing list