Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call forDemos
kuhtzch at corp.earthlink.net
Tue Sep 4 14:58:23 UTC 2007
Lmao. Thanks, Sean, I just snorted my cup of freshly brewed coffee. Ouch. :-)
From: Sean Donelan
Sender: owner-nanog at merit.edu
To: Stephen Stuart
Sent: Sep 4, 2007 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call forDemos
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Stephen Stuart wrote:
>>> Operators are probably more interested in the "fairness" part of
>>> "congestion" than the "efficiency" part of "congestion."
>> TCP's idea of fairness is a bit weird. Shouldn't it be per-user, not
> How would you define "user" in that context?
Operators always define the "user" as the person paying the bill. One
bill, one user.
Its fun to watch network engineers' heads explode.
Sent from my BlackBerry.
More information about the NANOG