Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos
Sean Donelan
sean at donelan.com
Tue Sep 4 14:30:57 UTC 2007
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Stephen Stuart wrote:
>>> Operators are probably more interested in the "fairness" part of
>>> "congestion" than the "efficiency" part of "congestion."
>>
>> TCP's idea of fairness is a bit weird. Shouldn't it be per-user, not
>> per-flow?
>
> How would you define "user" in that context?
Operators always define the "user" as the person paying the bill. One
bill, one user.
Its fun to watch network engineers' heads explode.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list