Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance?

Tue Oct 30 16:21:44 UTC 2007

At 12:07 PM 10/30/2007, Al Iverson wrote:

>On 10/30/07, chuck goolsbee <chucklist at forest.net> wrote:
>
> > On a more relevant and operational sort of note, it sure would be
> > nice if there were a NAMOG (North American Mail Operators Group) or
> > the like to resolve these sorts of issues. Feel free to clue-by-four
> > me if I've missed it.
>
>MAAWG come pretty close: http://www.maawg.org/home

Smaller/regional ISPs need not apply. Minimum cost of entry is 
$3,000/year, no voting rights ($12.5K if you actually care about 
voting). So if you're not Verizon or Comcast or similarly sized, it 
appears you're not really welcome.

Though it might make sense to discuss some other things NANOG could 
do in addition to worrying about routing table size and churn in the 
core, those are all discussions for the Futures list. 