Comcast blocking p2p uploads
Eric Spaeth
eric at spaethco.com
Sun Oct 21 00:46:34 UTC 2007
Leo Bicknell wrote:
> I'm a bit confused by your statement. Are you saying it's more
> cost effective for ISP's to carry downloads thousands of miles
> across the US before giving them to the end user than it is to allow
> a local end user to "upload" them to other local end users?
>
Not to speak on Joe's behalf, but whether the content comes from
elsewhere on the Internet or within the ISP's own network the issue is
the same: limitations on the transmission medium between the cable modem
and the CMTS/head-end. The issue that cable companies are having with
P2P is that compared to doing a HTTP or FTP fetch of the same content
you will use more network resources, particularly in the upstream
direction where contention is a much bigger issue. On DOCSIS 1.x
systems like Comcast's plant, there's a limitation of ~10mbps of
capacity per upstream channel. You get enough 384 - 768k connected
users all running P2P apps and you're going to start having problems in
a big hurry. It's to remove some of the strain on the upstream channels
that Comcast has started to deploy Sandvine to start closing *outbound*
connections from P2P apps.
-Eric
More information about the NANOG
mailing list