Some thoughts on 240/4

Fri Oct 19 17:08:39 UTC 2007

Leo,

> We need to get the code fixed, that is the most important item at
> this time.

This is absolutely true.  The purpose of my note was to provide an
understanding of why we're splitting the process into two by
demonstrating that picking the correct use requires more work.  Each of
the possible uses I described require much more detail  and
understanding.  We can gain that understanding as we're changing our
code since the uses are ALL unicast.

Also:
> I would ask everyone on this list to make it a checklist item for your very next vendor meeting.

This always helps.  It would also help if you made your opinions known
to "int-area at ietf.org", where this discussion continues.\

Eliot