Some thoughts on 240/4

Fri Oct 19 16:24:44 UTC 2007

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:48:57 EDT, Leo Bicknell said:

> In a message written on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:19:57AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> > How much ship date slip for the IPv6 features you need are you willing to
> > accept when 240/4 updates blow the schedule?
> 
> Why would the 240/4 updates blow the schedule?

More code, more regression testing, same number of programmers.  Do the math.

Take it as a given that it *will* slip the schedule some amount, because
the resources for a 240/4 feature will have to come from somewhere.  So
how much slippage are you willing to accept?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20071019/b6d0a453/attachment.sig>