240/4
Adrian Chadd
adrian at creative.net.au
Thu Oct 18 02:48:32 UTC 2007
> Asking the whole internet to support 240/4 is going to tie up
> valuable resources that would be far better off working on IPv6. Keep
> in mind that it's not just software patches. Software vendors don't do
> stuff for free. I doubt ISPs are going to pay huge amounts of money to
> support a peer crazy enough to try this. And until tested, there is no
> guarantee that hardware based routing platforms (your PFCs, etc) can
> route Class E addresses as if they're unicast.
So how about pulling a reachability test and announcing a few /19's from
240/4, stick a website on it and get people to report back?
Adrian
More information about the NANOG
mailing list