240/4
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Oct 17 21:42:22 UTC 2007
> I'm trying to avoid setting the expectation that 240/4 is
> just a simple extension to 10/8 and thus people should use it
> *today* when they run out of space in RFC1918.
I don't believe you.
If you were really trying to "avoid setting the expectation" then you
would be communicating with the authors of
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fuller-240space-00.txt to see
that the IETF gets their wording right.
This is IETF work and IANA work at this point, not NANOG work.
--Michael Dillon
More information about the NANOG
mailing list