240/4

Tue Oct 16 21:33:40 UTC 2007

On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:20:54 PDT, David Ulevitch said:

> The effort someone would spend figuring out if 204/4 is reachable and 
> not-pain-inducing in their infrastructure is better spent figuring out 
> how to make IPv6 work within their sphere of responsibilities.

After the pain felt by 69/8, 70/8, 71/8, and others, you'd think it would
almost be enough to make a provider say "screw it" and go IPv6-only. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20071016/ff96d713/attachment.sig>