How Not to Multihome

Tue Oct 9 17:52:31 UTC 2007

On 9 Oct 2007, at 18:48, Leo Vegoda wrote:

> On 9 Oct 2007, at 17:47, Andy Davidson wrote:
>> However, if a different third-party network then sweeps up their  
>> routing table by looking to remove more specifics that seem  
>> 'spoofed' using IRR data, the routes you intend to push onto the  
>> internet may well start to disappear from their perspective.
> I don't think this should be possible if the database implements  
> RPSS (RFC 2725) properly. I believe that it should only be possible  
> to create a more specific route object with the agreement using  
> whatever PGP/X.509 security you like if you have used mnt-lower and  
> mnt-routes attributes as appropriate.

mnt-lower works, but only if I know someone else wants to originate a  
more specific.  Routing in general doesn't care - this was the case I  
was making - hope I didn't cause confusion.

Andy