IPv6 routes, was: How Not to Multihome
William Herrin
herrin-nanog at dirtside.com
Tue Oct 9 01:21:27 UTC 2007
On 10/8/07, Keegan.Holley at sungard.com <Keegan.Holley at sungard.com> wrote:
> Wouldn't resources still be an issue. Since the address space is so much
> larger wouldn't the 235k v6 routes take up more than 4 times the router
> memory?
Keegan,
According to Cisco's product feature pages IPv6 routes take up twice
as much space in the TCAM as IPv4 routes. Make of that what you will.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the NANOG
mailing list