two questions - SWAG answers entertained
Marshall Eubanks
tme at multicasttech.com
Fri Oct 5 15:27:36 UTC 2007
On Oct 5, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:01:19 EDT, Marshall Eubanks said:
>
>> ## hop_histogram
>> # hop_histogram 1 1 968 2.78565e+07
>> # hop_histogram 2 1587 32780 7.74648e+08
>> # hop_histogram 3 12829 122320 1.06436e+09
>> # hop_histogram 4 8754 56473 2.98075e+08
>> # hop_histogram 5 2549 14877 4.19192e+07
>> # hop_histogram 6 432 1932 1.18231e+07
>> # hop_histogram 7 39 215 872786
>> # hop_histogram 8 6 32 50112
>> # hop_histogram 9 0 0 0
>> # hop_histogram 10 0 0 0
>> # hop_histogram 11 0 0 0
>> # hop_histogram 12 0 0 0
>> # hop_histogram 13 0 0 0
>> # hop_histogram 14 1 1 4094
>
> Are you able to share the identity/AS path of that outlier at 14,
> or at least
> explain how somebody got a path length of 14 without any paths of
> lengths 9
> through 13 showing up?
Yes -
Here it is :
AS 3010 SPRINT-MRN-BLOCK | 1 prefixes | 1
prefixes & 1 ASN supported | 4094 Addresses | 14 hops | as
path 174 3491 18734 28509 3001 3002 3003 3004 3005 3006
3007 3008 3009 3010
here is the only address block :
*> 201.160.16.0/20 38.101.161.116 4001 0 174 3491
18734 28509 3001 3002 3003 3004 3005 3006 3007 3008 3009 3010 i
I assume that this is some odd internal Sprint thing - maybe a lab in
Mexico as it is going through 28509 ?
28509 MX-TCSC23-LACNIC [RUM]
{62270 - cuernavaca - MO, MX} TV Cable S.A. de C.V.
None of the other 3001-3009 appear directly.
Could this be some new form of AS path prepending ? I really don't know.
Regards
Marshall
More information about the NANOG
mailing list