Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Sun Oct 21 21:13:33 UTC 2007
On 28-sep-2007, at 22:57, Alain Durand wrote:
> Tunneling is great, but it requires to allocate an IPv4 address...
> that I
> may not have in the first place.
If an IPv6-only box is going to talk to the IPv4 world, at some
point, the traffic needs to hit a dual stack system that can do the
IPv6/IPv4 translation.
I think an approach where you have a regular IPv4 NAT and then tunnel
the RFC 1918 addresses over an IPv6-only network would work better
than NAT-PT.
If the tunnel provisioning system is flexible enough, it could even
give unNATed IPv4 addresses to (just) the hosts that need them,
possibly only temporarily.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list