[NANOG-Admins] Options et. al. on admins@ list

Thu Nov 15 00:23:59 UTC 2007

They're not points, Alex. They should be agenda items.

On Nov 14, 2007 7:13 PM, Alex Pilosov <alex at pilosoft.com> wrote:
> Thanks Marty, I'll bring both points up.
>
> -alex
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> > Folks:
> >
> > We should be able to see subscribers to admins so that we know who is
> > on the list. Can we get a current listing so that we can see who is
> > receiving our mail?
> >
> > We should also use Merit's conference bridge if it's toll-free. We pay
> > for this stuff through our fees so we should not be tied to a members
> > service since it could be disrupted if that person does not attend or
> > is no longer on the MLC.
> >
> > Also, proposals
> >
> > Meeting Etiquette:
> >
> > Roberts Rules of Order
> > Quorum: 51% or more, depending upon membership make up.
> > Required to hold official Meeting: majority of voting members (4 as of current)
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. Adding people to admins at nanog.org
> >
> > When an individual is being proposed to be added to the MLC mailing
> > list, the proppsal will be discussed on admins at nanog.org. In the event
> > of any objection, the issue will be discussed and voted on at the next
> > MLC call.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Admins mailing list
> > Admins at nanog.org
> > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/admins
> >
>
>