large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]

Tom Grenier tgrenier at
Tue Nov 13 18:00:41 UTC 2007

Aruba has some pretty large implementations under their belt including
Microsoft Corp. Check them out.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog at [mailto:owner-nanog at] On Behalf Of
Niels Bakker
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 12:35 PM
To: nanog at
Subject: Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]

* frnkblk at (Frank Bulk) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 14:24 CET]:
>If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel 
>planning beyond adding more "channel blankets".

I understand Foundry's wireless products do the same thing.  Seems to 
work ok but have not heard about larger test cases than a hundred or so 

* carl at (Carl Karsten) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 05:56 CET]:
>On Wifi for 1000:

In the context of that, you may wish to peruse the proceedings of the 
last few CCC Congresses in Berlin, which had pretty much working 
wireless - even with thousands of attendees:

(They're still looking for a sponsor of wireless equipment for this 
year's edition, by the way)


	-- Niels.

"The Mac doesn't have a one-button mouse, it has a five-button mouse,
  four of the buttons on the keyboard."
			-- Peter da Silva <peter at>

More information about the NANOG mailing list