large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
frnkblk at iname.com
Tue Nov 13 14:23:01 UTC 2007
Marketing and theory -- I haven't had a chance to test it myself.
BTW, I'm not regurgitating Extricom's marketing rhetoric when I say you
don't need to worry about channel planning -- their product is designed with
that specifically in mind. The technical benefits and caveats of this
single-channel architecture, and the possible concerns that a network
planner might have around the requirement to have L1 connectivity from
Extricom's APs to their switch, are better discussed in another forum.
From: Elmar K. Bins [mailto:elmi at 4ever.de]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 7:46 AM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
frnkblk at iname.com (Frank Bulk) wrote:
> If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel
> beyond adding more "channel blankets".
Is that based on marketing, theory (based on the whitepapers and patent
descriptions) or practical experience?
More information about the NANOG