unwise filtering policy from cox.net
jeffshultz at wvi.com
Tue Nov 20 20:11:19 UTC 2007
S. Ryan wrote:
> Or it was a minor oversight and you're all pissing and moaning over
> That's a thought too.
Well, if the oversight involves filtering the "should never be filtered"
[email protected] address, it might be a bit more than minor.
But they ought to have a chance to fix it before being labeled the scum
of the earth, eh?
More information about the NANOG