aoxomoxoa at sunlightdata.com
Thu May 31 00:27:37 UTC 2007
This is more in the way of a leading question for those who are
attending NANOG 40.
I'll ask it the same way I did at NZNOG back in February --
what problem is it that IPv6 is actually supposed to solve?
I used to know the answer to this, but I don't now. In 1997
(or even years before, reading Scott Bradner's eloquent advocacy
for it back then) it would have been: address space, security,
extensions, QOS. But it seems to me these have either been
sidestepped, addressed somewhat, or the benefits have not
overcome the costs in a clear business case sense.
As I said -- my purpose in posing this is to stimulate discussion
at Bellevue. It was the most interesting thing talked about at
Palmerston North, at least until the cold beer arrived.
More information about the NANOG