IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed May 30 07:16:19 UTC 2007
But now PI is there, no more restrictions in the path, so they can use
"traditional" multihoming :-)
> De: Donald Stahl <don at calis.blacksun.org>
> Responder a: <owner-nanog at merit.edu>
> Fecha: Tue, 29 May 2007 20:53:36 -0400 (EDT)
> Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> CC: Nanog <nanog at nanog.org>
> Asunto: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
>> We do have dual stack in all our customer sites, and at the time being
>> didn't got complains or support calls that may be considered due to the
> So far everyone who has contacted me has generally reported a positive
> experience with their transitions.
> The biggest complaints so far have come from end users who want to
> multihome and will be unable to do so under IPv6 due to allocation
> End user sites seem to be of the opinion that they have enough addresses
> and that IP shortages are the ISP's problem. They don't want to spend
> money on upgrades only to wind up with a lesser service than they already
> have- and that's a fair criticism.
> Does it make sense to allow early adopters to multi-home and "punish"
> those who delay by making it significantly harder? Would that help? Hurt?
> Accomplish nothing?
> Regarding the prefix filters-
> Do /32 filters make sense given the ISP allocation of /32 or would a /34
> filter (for example) make sense to allow for very limited deaggregation
> (to make moves and transitions easier- or to allow better traffic
> balances)- or is this just asking for problems? I'm just curious about
> opinions and by no means trying to start a flame war.
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
More information about the NANOG