NANOG 40 agenda posted

Tue May 29 21:47:08 UTC 2007

We do have dual stack in all our customer sites, and at the time being
didn't got complains or support calls that may be considered due to the

I heard the same from other people. I also heard the opposite some times,
but I haven't been able to debug any of those cases to understand where is
the problem, except a few cases of people *not having stable IPv6
connectivity* and using AAAA in their servers: Bad practice !


> De: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at>
> Responder a: <owner-nanog at>
> Fecha: Tue, 29 May 2007 20:39:20 +0200
> Para: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at>
> CC: NANOG list <nanog at>
> Asunto: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
> On 29-mei-2007, at 18:17, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>> it ends with this comment: "If your hosting provider is serving
>> your domain with IPv6, then it is time to find a new provider."
> I guess they can stick with their current hosting provider then,
> because:
>> dig aaaa
> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> aaaa
> ;; global options:  printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36772
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
> Unfortunately, treading lightly as to not to wake the bugs means that
> they aren't fixed... In this regard, it would be interesting to hear
> from people who run non-trivial IPv6-enabled WWW sites about
> complaints about their reachability.

The IPv6 Portal:

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

More information about the NANOG mailing list