NANOG 40 agenda posted

Donald Stahl don at
Tue May 29 21:21:08 UTC 2007

>>> but ipv6 is more secure, yes? :) (no it is not)
>> Does the relative security of IVp4 and IPv6 *really* matter on the same Internet
>> that has Vint Cerf's 140 million pwned machines on it?
> was the ":)" not enough: "I'm joking" ??
>> Just askin', ya know?
> some people do think that it does... they would be wrong, but they don't
> know that.
There is something to be said for not being able to blindly spew worm 
traffic and still expect to get a sensible hit ratio as with IPv4.


More information about the NANOG mailing list