NANOG 40 agenda posted

Randy Bush randy at
Tue May 29 15:08:07 UTC 2007

> (*) Anyone advocating staying with IPv4 and relying
>     on NAT and market demand as an alternative
>     needs to consider the completely deaggregated
>     address usage pattern (and routing table explosion)
>     that results.

not that i think this a nice approach or anything, but ...

it would seem that the size of the routing table in this case, as in
others, is proportional to the number of end sites, pi multi-homed if
that is the dominant policy, or pa aggregated if that is the dominant


More information about the NANOG mailing list