IPv6 Advertisements
bmanning at karoshi.com
bmanning at karoshi.com
Tue May 29 12:37:52 UTC 2007
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:45:38AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 May 2007, Donald Stahl wrote:
> >What is the smallest IPv6 advertisement that organizations are going to
> >honour- are we still looking at a minimum of a /48?
>
> Anything more specific than /32 is going to be filtered at some
> portion of the ISPs whether for the good or bad. There are some
> subsets of the v6 address space that have a higher chance of /48
> working (for some definition of 'working') than other parts of the
> address space, though.
>
perhaps you might better phrase this as; " Anything more specific
than a /3 is going to be filtered at some portion of the ISPS whether
for the good or bad."
just because you have a prefix of (any) size, does not assure
that everyone will route it.
--bill
More information about the NANOG
mailing list