NANOG 40 agenda posted

Sun May 27 15:42:41 UTC 2007

On Sun, 27 May 2007, william(at)elan.net wrote:

>
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
>
> >> So, I think I can sum up your reply by saying that your suggestion is
> >> to provide a lesser service than we do now (v4 NAT, proxies, etc.
> >> sound to me like lesser service), during the transition period.
> >
> > I think you also missed the suggestion that sending out CPE with DD-wrt
> > was a 'good idea'. Honestly DD-wrt/open-wrt are nice solutions for testing
> > or for people willing to fiddle, they are not a good solution for
> > 'grandma'.
>
> My parents and brother both have linksys with dd-wrt that I put up.
> I don't maintain it at all and it "just works". No, they are not using
> v6, but if it was available I don't anticipate any problems as their
> system os at home all support it now.

excellent, so 3 out of 6 billion can work fine..
mass-supportability/deplyability that is not.