NANOG 40 agenda posted

matthew zeier mrz at velvet.org
Sun May 27 02:35:34 UTC 2007



Krichbaum, Eric wrote:
> Agreed.  The statement from ARIN is recent and impacts us all.  We've
> got our core v6 routing in place, but operationally, that's really the
> easy part.  Modifying the tools such as billing, monitoring, management,
> tracking, and auditting are the slow link in the chain.  The space is
> dwindling but that doesn't seem to be putting the transition pressure on
> if the services aren't there to use v6.  Until more transit providers
> support it, the reasoning for smaller provider to transition is limited.

And give that most end user allocations are /64s, could bind really handle a 
18,446,744,073,700,000,000 line zone file? :)



More information about the NANOG mailing list