Interesting new dns failures

Per Heldal heldal at
Fri May 25 14:40:39 UTC 2007

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 17:46 +0000, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
> which brings us back to my original comment: "we need a policy most likely
> from ICANN that requires some action based on proper documentation and
> evidence or wrong-doing/malfeasance. That policy needs to dictate some
> monetary penalties for non-compliance."

It's too late to put the genie back in the bottle. The only way to
change the policy before the contract term ends is to either move ICANN
out of US jurisdiction (to brake contract terms) or to organise a
grass-root uprising to replace ICANNs root with something else.


More information about the NANOG mailing list