Interesting new dns failures

Mon May 21 13:43:39 UTC 2007

On Mon, 21 May 2007 10:38:56 -0000, bmanning at karoshi.com said:
> 	if you can get concensus to remove .com, i'm sure the roots would
> 	be willing to help out.

Whose bright idea *was* it to design a tree-hierarchical structure, and then
dump essentially all 140 million entries under the same node, anyhow? :)

I'll bet a large pizza that 90% or more could be relocated to a more
appropriate location in the DNS tree, and nobody except the domain holder
and less than a dozen other people will notice/care in the slightest. Now
if anybody has a good idea on what to do with those companies that register
www.thissummersblockbustermoviecomingsoonnow.com ;)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070521/64099204/attachment.sig>