ISP CALEA compliance

Joe Provo nanog-post at
Sun May 13 03:15:28 UTC 2007

On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 10:43:15PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> Too bad the PC hasn't solicited a talk in this area. They ought to.

Too bad that the collective-we choose to beat up the PC for not 
providing agenda information in advance, and then change tack 
to beat them up when the increased transparency of incremental 
information for confirmed talks doesn't cover current timely 
issues such as earthquake impact or regulatory vagaries. Rather 
than assuming, suggestions for ways to provide insight to 
agenda works-in-progress would be useful.


             RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE

More information about the NANOG mailing list