ISP CALEA compliance
Jason Frisvold
xenophage0 at gmail.com
Thu May 10 18:48:35 UTC 2007
On 5/10/07, Patrick Muldoon <doon at inoc.net> wrote:
> We've been under the impression that is *all* data. So for us,
> things like PPPoE Sessions, just putting a tap/span port upstream of
> the aggregation router will not work as you would miss any traffic
> going from USER A <-> USER B, if they where on the same aggregation
> device. Since the Intercept has to be invisible to the parties
> being tapped, you can't route their traffic back out and then in
> either, since the tap would change the flow. In that regard, we've
> been upgrading our older NPE's to newer ones in order to support
> SII, All the while I keep having something a co-worker said stuck in
> my head. "CALEA - Consultant And Lawyer Enrichment Act" :)
Agreed.. Now to dig into the legal document to see if this is right..
Anyone have a legal gibberish to english converter? (And no, a lawyer
doesn't count)
> -Patrick
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
XenoPhage0 at gmail.com
http://blog.godshell.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list