SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)

Fri Mar 16 23:59:02 UTC 2007

Some locations are just too cost prohibitive to multihome, but that really
is a select few.  Few places are out of the reach of a couple wireless hops
back to civilization.

--Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On Behalf Of Wil
Schultz
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 6:56 PM
To: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)

Almost ALL?

Any company, or any person for that matter, that relies on their  
Internet connectivity for their lively hood should be multihomed.

-wil

On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

> Almost ALL providers should be multihomed.
>
> --Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On  
> Behalf Of
> virendra rode //
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:26 AM
> To: NANOG
> Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Frank Bulk wrote:
>> http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
>>
>> Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
>> providers?
>>
>> Frank
> - ------------------------
> Just curious, should "small responsive providers" should be multi- 
> homed?
>
>
>
> regards,
> /virendra
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFF+XOApbZvCIJx1bcRAtkwAJ9vNak3F8FlCf9VDycf6IlAr445nACg59kB
> w2OWAGdchd2XQyxxgZWQaug=
> =Yb1+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>