[funsec] Not so fast, broadband providers tell big users (fwd)
Jack Bates
jbates at brightok.net
Tue Mar 13 20:08:12 UTC 2007
Todd Vierling wrote:
>
> The reality is probably that the service is available, but the slow
> motion of *infrastructure* network upgrades (where the CPE might not
> even need a change in some cases) is holding back the rest of the
> works.
>
Network upgrades tend to not be cheap, and I doubt the vendors care to lower
their pricing. Coupling voice and data in the same remotes is even more costly,
although for some rural telcos has meant finally integrating carrier and
providing v90 dialup speeds for those who couldn't get broadband. Add to this
the cost of "oops, last years technology isn't good enough, for X amount per
system, you can replace it all for this years technology."
Of course the worst financial hit that WILL be reflected in DSL speeds, pricing,
and QOS is CALEA packet intercepts by far. 98% of my tasks are on hold until May
15th while I redesign and replace equipment across the board. Half the vendors
don't even support CALEA directly, and if not for Cisco, I'd be up a creek
without a paddle. As it is, everyone I've talked to has pretty much said that
they won't be compliant to the letter of the law (though 99% is better than
nothing). I just watched a telco just now getting into the broadband business
get slapped with CALEA fees. $400-$600/mo may not seem alot (and is cheap even
for many of the trusted 3rd parties), but for a startup service that may have
1-10 customers initially, it's a complete loss and will still be a large chunk
of profits when the most the area can sustain is 400-1000 subscribers (being
generous as the one I'm thinking of only has 1500 phone subscribers).
-Jack
More information about the NANOG
mailing list