Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law.
sjsobol at JustThe.net
Fri Mar 16 02:31:44 UTC 2007
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, S. Ryan wrote:
> Typical SORBS behavior. While this guy can demand all he wants, doesn't
> mean he will get what he wants or that he's right or wrong.
What's wrong with what Mat posted? The guy claiming DNS is regulated by
federal law is an idiot. Not that I always agree with what Mat says, but
the guy's claims are obviously and patently false. The claims, in fact,
are so ridiculous that I tend to think he's making them to weasel out of
solving the problem that got him listed in the first place. People doing
that *deserve* to be publically ridiculed.
When I talk to Mat I generally have no problems having a civil and
productive discussion with him. But I don't start out with an attitude,
and I don't cook up absurd stories to try to get out of fixing my spam
problem. (Not that I have one, but if I did, I'd not try to weasel out of
> Personally, we gave up using SORBS because of it's very high
> false-positive ratio
YMMV; at $DAYJOB we don't seem to have the same problem.
Disclaimer: My opinions, not my boss's, etc.
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek ** Java/VB/VC/PHP/Perl ** Linux/*BSD/Windows
Victorville, California PGP:0xE3AE35ED
It's all fun and games until someone starts a bonfire in the living room.
More information about the NANOG