Security gain from NAT: Top 5
Jo Rhett
jrhett at svcolo.com
Wed Jun 27 00:06:04 UTC 2007
On Jun 6, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> #1 NAT advantage: it protects consumers from vendor
>> lock-in.
>>
> Speaking of FUD... NAT does nothing here that is not also
> accomplished
> through the use of PI addressing
If you completely ignore the cost of routing table growth to give
every company their own PI, sure.
>> #2 NAT advantage: it protects consumers from add-on
>> fees for addresses space.
>>
> More FUD. The correct solution to this problem is to make it possible
> for end users to get reasonable addresses directly from RIRs for
> reasonable fees.
Reasonable is a hard word. We've had to turn away customers who
wanted to assign a /27 to each and every machine, without actual
justification for more than 3 IPs per machine. Sometimes people want
to do insane things that aren't technically reasonable, but it's what
they want to do. NAT gives them that option.
--
Jo Rhett
senior geek
Silicon Valley Colocation
Support Phone: 408-400-0550
More information about the NANOG
mailing list