Network Level Content Blocking (UK) for people who cant be bothered to read the article..

David Freedman david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Fri Jun 8 10:05:37 UTC 2007


Its too late, you've already admitted that the data exists and can be 
captured.

This is always where it starts...

Dave.


Leigh Porter wrote:
> 
> Alexander Harrowell wrote:
> 
>> On 6/7/07, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Since only port 80 is passed through the filter then of course there are
>>> all manor of things you could do to circumvent the filter and this will
>>> of course always be the case as people will use whatever they can to get
>>> what they want. After all, all yuo really need to do in order to get all
>>> the dodgy material you want is to subscribe to a decent USENET service
>>> and get it all from that.
>>>
>>> For what it's worth though it works well for what it is and we certainly
>>> get a few hits on it.
>>>
>>
>> Have you been asked by the Dibble for the squid's server log yet? It's
>> the obvious next step - if you had a URL request blocked, obviously
>> you were where you shouldn't have been. You're either with us...or
>> you're with the terrorists.
> 
> 
> I actually removed the code in Squid that logs so it's impossible to log 
> without significant development work ;-)
> 
> -- 
> Leigh Porter
> 
> 




More information about the NANOG mailing list