IPv6 Advertisements
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Sat Jun 2 14:56:57 UTC 2007
On 1-jun-2007, at 14:58, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
>>> I believe that a separate /48 per site is better regardless of
>>> whether
>>> or not the company has contracted with a single ISP for all
>>> sites, or
>>> not. As far as I am concerned if there is a separate access circuit,
>>> then it is a site and it deserves its own /48 assignment/allocation.
>> So aggregation is no longer a goal?
> why do you say that? he COULD mean that they should get their ip
> assignment from their provider, which would/should aggregate for
> him...
> right?
I thought we were talking about PI... Obviously with PA the only
issue would be burning through an ISP's space very fast, but with
IPv6 that's not a huge deal.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list