IPv6 & DNS
thegameiam at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 29 17:19:05 UTC 2007
--- Barrett Lyon <blyon at blyon.com> wrote:
> I don't see any v6 glue there... Rather than having
> about transition to IPv6, maybe we should be sure it
> works natively
> first? It's rather ironic to think that for v6 DNS
> to work an
> incumbent legacy protocol is still required.
Consider that Windows XP (and server 2k3) will not,
under any circumstance, send a DNS request over IPv6,
and yet they were widely considered "IPv6 compliant."
Consider also how long it took to get a working way of
telling autoconfigured hosts about which DNS servers
to use (without manually entering 128-bit addresses).
To me, the above show that the bulk of the actual
deployments were in dual-stack or tunnel environments,
and greenfield implementations were few and far
between. There's a surprising amount of unexplored
"here be dragons" territory in IPv6, given how long
some very smart people have been working on it.
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
More information about the NANOG